User talk:Ohdear - Revision history

Ohdear: added a comment

2008-12-21T07:58:35Z

added a comment

Sturedman at 16:12, 19 December 2008

2008-12-19T16:12:16Z

Ohdear: min. markup changes

2008-12-19T12:42:00Z

min. markup changes

Ohdear: script kiddies & IPs

2008-12-17T11:08:20Z

script kiddies & IPs

Ohdear: reply

2008-10-20T19:08:39Z

Sturedman at 18:32, 20 October 2008

2008-10-20T18:32:56Z

Sturedman at 18:08, 16 October 2008

2008-10-16T18:08:54Z

Sturedman at 19:26, 15 October 2008

2008-10-15T19:26:10Z

New page

Hi Ohdear,

you are doing a good job here.
If you want to do it more efficiently, please send me a personal message on the forum.

Cheers,

Sturedman

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:58, 21 December 2008
Line 51:		Line 51:
	Cheers,		Cheers,
	Stu -- 2008-12-19 17:11		Stu -- 2008-12-19 17:11
		+
		+
		+	''After five days of vandalism they seem to have given up -- or at least taken a rest. Nothing bad within the last 24 hours.''
		+
		+	''OhDear -- 2008-12-21 08:58''

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:12, 19 December 2008
Line 43:		Line 43:

	''OhDear -- 2008-12-17 12:10''		''OhDear -- 2008-12-17 12:10''
		+
		+
		+	The new spam is looking pointless. No URLs for google-pageranking, just trash. Let's see, maybe they get bored.
		+
		+	Thank you for your good work!
		+
		+	Cheers,
		+	Stu -- 2008-12-19 17:11

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 Cheers,
-Sturedman --  2008-10-15 21:26:10
+Sturedman --  2008-10-15 21:26
 ''How can I remove a page newly created by a SPAMmer? Right now after removing the SPAM there's an empty page left.''
-OhDear -- 2008-10-16
+''OhDear -- 2008-10-16''
 Try it now - I have raised your privileges.
@@ Line 20: / Line 22: @@
 Cheers,
-Stu --  2008-10-16 20:08:54
+Stu --  2008-10-16 20:08
@@ Line 27: / Line 29: @@
 Cheers,
-Stu -- 2008-10-20 20:32:56
+Stu -- 2008-10-20 20:32
-Oh, and I thought the SPAMmers were frustrated or at least went on vacation. Silly me! - Anyway, I think it was a good idea to deny anonymous write access and at least for the time beeing it seems to work.
+''OhDear -- 2008-10-20 21:08''
-Hmm, apparantly some script-kiddies are active right now, registering before vandalising the pages. Unfortunately I can see only the (obviously one-time) usernames, which I've blocked so far. I don't know the inner workings of the wiki but I suspect that the IPs would be helpful in these cases (to block them as well).
+''Hmm, apparantly some script-kiddies are active right now, registering before vandalising the pages. Unfortunately I can see only the (obviously one-time) usernames, which I've blocked so far. I don't know the inner workings of the wiki but I suspect that the IPs would be helpful in these cases (to block them as well).
-Is there a way to do this?
+Is there a way to do this?''
-Ah, and by the way: The server seems to be one hour in the future. a wrong timezone setting?
+''Ah, and by the way: The server seems to be one hour in the future. A wrong timezone setting?''
-OhDear -- 2008-12-17 12:10
+''OhDear -- 2008-12-17 12:10''

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 Cheers,
-Sturedman
+Sturedman --  2008-10-15 21:26:10
 ''How can I remove a page newly created by a SPAMmer? Right now after removing the SPAM there's an empty page left.''
 Try it now - I have raised your privileges.
@@ Line 18: / Line 20: @@
 Cheers,
-Stu
+Stu --  2008-10-16 20:08:54
@@ Line 25: / Line 27: @@
 Cheers,
-Stu
+Stu -- 2008-10-20 20:32:56
 Oh, and I thought the SPAMmers were frustrated or at least went on vacation. Silly me! - Anyway, I think it was a good idea to deny anonymous write access and at least for the time beeing it seems to work.
-Ohdear
+OhDear -- 2008-10-20 21:08:39

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:08, 16 October 2008
Line 7:		Line 7:

	Sturedman		Sturedman
		+
		+	''How can I remove a page newly created by a SPAMmer? Right now after removing the SPAM there's an empty page left.''
		+
		+	Try it now - I have raised your privileges.
		+
		+	To revert a vandalization of an existing page, simply click on "diff" in the recent changes list, and then on "rollback". Works only for one change however.
		+
		+	You can also block users, but it's only worth it if more than 1 spam comes from the same adress.
		+
		+	Cheers,
		+
		+	Stu

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:08, 20 October 2008
Line 26:		Line 26:
	Cheers,		Cheers,
	Stu		Stu
		+
		+
		+	Oh, and I thought the SPAMmers were frustrated or at least went on vacation. Silly me! - Anyway, I think it was a good idea to deny anonymous write access and at least for the time beeing it seems to work.
		+
		+	Ohdear

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:32, 20 October 2008
Line 18:		Line 18:
	Cheers,		Cheers,

		+	Stu
		+
		+
		+	Kry has globally blocked anonymous write access, in case you wondered where all the spam has gone.
		+	Anything still getting through should be posted by a registered user. Please ban him in such a case.
		+
		+	Cheers,
	Stu		Stu